Businessmen respond to dropped charges Watch Video See Photos Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Check This Out!

checkthisoutnewhome

yoopertubehome 

Slideshow
Photo:

Bruns, Swift & LaVallie are mad at business partners.

By Jerry Hume
Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 5:04 p.m.

Read more: Local, Crime, Ryan Bruns, Brian Swift, Chad Lavallie, Michael Gokey, Joel Westrom.

MARQUETTE -- We’re getting reaction from the three men who, on Wednesday, had the charges against them dismissed.  The charges were dismissed against businessmen Ryan Bruns, Brian Swift and Chad LaVallie in the Hawks Ridge Condominium scandal.

Police originally said the three businessmen, along with two others, used false pretenses to obtain money for an investment.  The two others are Michael Gokey and Joel Westrom.

Bruns, Swift and LaVallie say they’re relieved charges against them have been dropped.  And it's clear they're not happy with Gokey and Westrom, their partners at Tristar Development.

"What's most upsetting to us is the fact that while this project was collapsing, Mr. Gokey and Mr. Westrom and others have been taking, funneling money out of this project while they knew we were suffering," said LaVallie.

Gokey's attorney declined to comment for this story.  Calls to Westrom's attorney were not returned.

Bruns, Swift and LaVallie told us it was Gokey and Westrom behind the alleged crime.  Prosecutors accuse Gokey and Westrom of fraud and using false pretenses to obtain money to build condos at Hawks Ridge in Marquette.  But the condos were never built.

The three tell us they were never involved in day-to-day activities with the project.  They were just business partners who thought they were making a good investment.

But after no signs of construction on the condos and money bleeding from their pockets, they got suspicious, and the three say they met with Gokey.

"(Gokey) met with the three of us,” said Swift, “he spilled his guts, basically told us this project was a sham.  He told us he was going to make it right and we trusted him again."

But soon after, the three say they went to police.

Although the charges against the three have been dropped, they say their reputations have been damaged.

"Going through this process, being here locally, it's been a hard road for me," said Bruns.

The three expect more charges to be filed on their behalf against Gokey and Westrom.  Between them, they say they lost a half a million dollars.

Gokey and Westrom are expected to be back in court on December 1.

SPONSORED CONTENT
15 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV6, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

Title is required

Posted by Tom A., Marqq, MI - Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 3:04 p.m.

Follow-up to a post by Mark Suwyn, Escanaba - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.

Mark. You can try to win arguments and prove points by just telling people to use "common sense".

If people just used common sense we would still believe the sun revolved around the earth and that the earth was flat. It took people who went against common sense to prove those two theories. I've read old statements that tried to justify slavery due to "common sense".

Posted by Mark Suwyn, Escanaba - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.

"Innocence cannot be proven"...

You live in a sad world Mary Nichols. You ever heard of common sense? Its a good thing, I suggest you look it up.

Gokey & Westrom are the Crooked Contractors

Posted by K R, Mqt - Tuesday, November 24, 2009 at 7:32 a.m.

I am very informed of the internal dealings of this case and there are no contractors involved in this for any reason other than to stand as witnesses. I see how the charges could have led someone to believe that there were in fact independent contractors involved in the scandal, but the fact of the matter is that when the charges refer to contractor fraud and illegal use of contractor funds it means Gokey & Westrom as they were their own general contractors and only hired companies to do the work as sub contractors. Sorry to be the one to let you down but,nothing more exciting will come of this other than more charges against Gokey & Westrom.

Way to go Sue and Brian

Posted by Brenda King, Flat Rock - Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 7:19 p.m.

I am proud to call you cousin. You have always stood for what is good and right! Wish there were many more like you!!!

Bruns, LaValllie and Swift owed an APOLOGY!

Posted by Kelly J, Mqt - Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 1:46 p.m.

The prosecutor and the police owe these guys a public apology! It is quite clear that the cops did not do their work and the prosecutor jumped the gun not knowing what was going on.
Can't wait to watch this thing unfold and see who the crooked builders and other contractors are. I hope these guys can get some of their money back and put the screws to Gokey and Westrom.

Innocence

Posted by Suzanne Rossi, Green Bay - Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 1:28 a.m.

I'm responding to the person who wrote about knowing who you partner with. Brian did know Mike Gokey, very well, for 10 years, they were friends. What really happened is that for many reasons that don't excuse his behavior, Mike became desperate in his life and chose to make very bad decisions, decisions that hurt his friends and other people. So how long must one know someone before they can trust them? As soon as Brian figured out what was really going on, he called the police. Please stop making up possible scenarios about things you know nothing about. That is exactly what hurts the innocent. If you know nothing, say nothing. If you know something, call the prosecutor.

Name Names, Please

Posted by Interested Reader, Negaunne Twp. - Saturday, November 21, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.

The most interesting thing I found in this story is this statement...

"What's most upsetting to us is the fact that while this project was collapsing, Mr. Gokey and Mr. Westrom AND OTHERS have been taking, funneling money out of this project while they knew we were suffering," said LaVallie. (CAPS added).

Who are the OTHERS that have been "taking," and "funneling" money out of the project? It's obvious that Mr. LaVallie knows who these other people are. I am hoping that the "others" referenced will be charged as well!

Invest

Posted by r r, manis - Saturday, November 21, 2009 at 11:40 a.m.

But don't you think when you go into buisness together with someone, everyone should pay attention to the bank statements / records of everything that's being done / hold meetings for all involved to go over EVERYTHING pretaining to - course some people are good at hiding important documents: hiding it under the rug.

Agree with Mary

Posted by AJ in Gwinn, Gwinn - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 12:05 p.m.

Innocence was not proven in this case; the charges were dropped. Which could mean a few different options:

A. They are innocent and were completely unaware of any misdoings.

B. The prosecution did not have enough evidence to hold up in court. (Which may or may not prove their innocence.)

C. The prosecution determined that these 3 partners did not have a big hand in this and in return for their testimony against the remaining two, the prosecution did not pursue charges on them.

I am fine assuming the first option, as it is in my mind the most probable in this case. I feel bad for these gentlemen; it will very much hurt their names.

Although guilt by association is not something I believe in, I think association does sometimes bite you when a crime like this is committed. As investors, they should have investigated this guy better before entrusting money to him. Still even if they did, there is always the risk of something like this happening. I hope it is a lesson to would-be investors to only invest with proven and trustworthy individuals and go with your gut if something does smell right.

RE: Justa Yooper

Posted by Mark Ett, Marquette - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 10:47 a.m.

You just did. :)

I'm Waiting.

Posted by justa yooper, houghton - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 10:27 a.m.

I am just waiting for someone to say that these 3 had charges dropped as part of a Republican Conspiracy!

Mary Mary Quite Contrary

Posted by Mark Suwyn, Escanaba - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.

"Innocence cannot be proven"...

You live in a sad world Mary Nichols. You ever heard of common sense? Its a good thing, I suggest you look it up.

Mary

Posted by joke joker, marquette - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 9:09 a.m.

You are correct, but must be blind. It's obvious the Prosecuter dropped the ball here. These three should not have been charged in the first place. Do you have any clue as to how unusual this is? Charges being dropped after a few short weeks? They did not do their homework or the police who did the investigation on the 3 INNOCENT GUYS are morons. Let the system work, but these two CRIMINALS Gokey and Westrom are bad players.

i agree with mary

Posted by Patrick Swanzy, swanzy - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.

these guys were business partners. ignorance is no excuse.

Guilt By Association

Posted by Mary Elizabeth Nichols, St. Ignace, Michigan - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 8:08 a.m.

"Charges were dropped" against 3 men; they were NOT proven innocent, as claimed by another commenter here.

Innocence cannot be proven!

The two remaining defendants will face charges through a prosecution procedure.

At this time, no one is guilty.

Like the judge, let's all reserve our decisions until the facts are known.

Shame on some of you

Posted by Mark Suwyn, Escanaba - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 8:32 p.m.

For all you people throwing these three under a bus during this... shame on you. Three good people who have gone through hell in the last month publically with their names and a lot of people posting on these stories here were part of it. Guilty until proven innocent. Well they are proven innocent now so give these guys a break. They deserve it.

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO