No contest plea for illegal netting Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Check This Out!

checkthisoutnewhome

yoopertubehome 

Photo

Daryl Tatrow of Garden and Kerry Johnson of Cooks are being charged with fishing with an illegal device, which is a misdemeanor.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 2:52 p.m.

Read more: Local, Crime, Illegal Netting, Gill Nets, Fishing, Bay De Noc

DELTA COUNTY -- Two men who were caught using a gill net in Delta County earlier this month were arraigned in court Wednesday.

Daryl Tatrow of Garden and Kerry Johnson of Cooks are being charged with fishing with an illegal device, which is a misdemeanor.

They were using gill nets in Bay de Noc when conservation officers spotted them with 1,100 pounds of fish.

They could face up to 90 days in jail.  Both will also lose their fishing license for three years.

Tatrow is also being charged with obstructing an officer after he fled the scene on foot.

Both pled no contest to the charges and their hearings have been set for a later date.

SPONSORED CONTENT
16 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV6, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

Wrong

Posted by Tim Stupak, Lansing, MI - Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 11:17 p.m.

I am a tribal member and yes you may have anybody you want out on the boat while you are netting fish... It is called a OBSERVER... The white man may be on the boat with the Native American aslong as the white man is not touching anything or doing anything..

Non Natives Fishing

Posted by g n, MSTQ - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 9:06 p.m.

It would not matter if the men had been fishing with the Native American even if his license was current. I am married to a tribal member with a subsistance fishing license. Since I am not a tribal memeber I am not allowed under their rules and laws to go set or pull a net with him. They were doing something illegal. It does not matter who they were with.

think this

Posted by r r, manis - Friday, November 20, 2009 at 8:14 a.m.

A little fish for their freezer? That's more than a little. If everyone went out and took this many fish; how many fish do you think in a short matter of time would be left in the great lakes? Limits for all!

My O MY

Posted by shawn j, cooks - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 1:14 p.m.

My oh My how this has turned into a race thing. THEY WERE ALL AT FAULT!! Native American or not. They made the choice and are paying the price, they were all trying to put a little fish in their freezer times are hard.

in the 'indians' defense

Posted by sk b, cooks - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 12:20 p.m.

shawn j., i am pretty sure the guys knew his tribal fishing rights weren't current. i also know that the 'indian' was called and told to come and join the 'white' boys event. the 'indian' didn't own any of the equipment. he went down so he could fill his freezer, and perhaps help out some of his family.

Why

Posted by T C, UP - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 11:36 a.m.

Why does is always have to boil down to race? Us vs. Them, white vs. indian, native vs. non-native. The ignorance that is spouted here by both sides when issues like this arise is appalling. No wonder society today is in the state it is in. Tribal members are prosecuted in tribal court if the violation occurs within ceded territories. This should not be a race issue, it is simply about people breaking the law, tribal or non. Violators of hunting and fishing laws come in all shapes, sizes, and races.

Why Bother?

Posted by yooper vern, powers - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 11:00 a.m.

Sounds like they will be able to do the same kinda fishing for the next three years, and not even have to pay for a license.
They should be fined the amount it will cost to replace all the illegal fish they took...X3 (for the next three years). Somehow I get the feeling this was not their first time pulling illegal nets.

MR.

Posted by k k, manistique - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 8:54 a.m.

First of all it is being made a big deal because it happened in GARDEN. So what people got caught with fish, they did not kill someone. You don't hear about the two Indians they were with. That is prejudice.

netters be gone

Posted by max poles on the bay, Garden - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 8:50 a.m.

shame shame, our family fishes and teaches our children the wonderful experience and how lucky we are to have such a great body of water to use, we see this happen all season long, it's about time our DNR is finally watching, and "trying" to "reel" the bad fish in. there are more than this crew out there. to stand behind the "Indian" legality is bull, just a try to get out of it, we saw you all season out there!!! hopefully we will see you behind bars, how do you explain this to your kids??? when we are trying to say well we got our limit we have to stop fishing now...

Not really

Posted by shawn J, cooks - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 7:27 a.m.

Actually they were fishing with a Native American who neglected to tell them he did not renew his fishing license. Guess that makes it their mistake but should have been mentioned on the radio. At least they took responsibility for their actions.

Where ya all go?

Posted by K H, Lanse - Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 3:52 a.m.

So it wasn't Indians? Why don't we have 36 comments here now? A white man is asking all you prejudice, judgemental, assumptive ingrates. Hate to tell you I told you so. I wouldn't blame an entire community on my lack of fishing skills, or a pack of wolves on my lack of hunting skills.

Both will also lose their fishing license for three years?

Posted by First Name Last Name, Here - Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 8:34 p.m.

Uhm, they were illegally fishing with a net. The law didn't stop them the first time. What makes anyone think that levying legal action against law breakers will be obeyed by said law breakers.

"You, law breaker, you didn't obey the law the first time, so we will enact legal action against you and expect you to obey it..."

Does anyone *honestly* believe that they will listen and not fish at all the next three years? I don't.

younger generation

Posted by the father, delta - Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 6:59 p.m.

Maybe i should just teach my young kids to fish with nets instead of poles! Atleast there chances of catching a fish will be better instead of getting skunked!

ANOTHER OPTION...

Posted by A NON FISHER, SUPERIOR SHORES - Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 6:41 p.m.

How about losing their boat too?!?

Fine

Posted by yoopr 1, Da U.P eh - Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 5:30 p.m.

They could face up to 90 days in jail. Both will also lose their fishing license for three years.

What a Joke-Wonder what kind of Deal our Wonderful DNR helped them get this Horrible fine

illegal netting

Posted by used to be a yooper, Illinois - Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 4:24 p.m.

They should lose their fishing licenses for life!!

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO