Digging In: Part Four Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Check This Out!

checkthisoutnewhome

yoopertubehome 

Photo

What kind of impact would new mines have on tourism?

By Jerry Hume
Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 4:08 p.m.

Read more: Local

Tourism is a billion dollar industry in Upper Michigan.  But some environmentalists are concerned that if more mining companies start digging here, it could change the image of the U.P. and drive tourists away.

"I certainly believe people would choose not to come if the U.P. has a reputation as a new sulfide mining district," Michelle Halley with the National Wildlife Federation said.

Save the Wild U.P.’s Babette Welch believes the character of the U.P. would change radically.

"It changes the region from primarily an outdoor, wonderful green attraction to fenced areas, industrial areas, large traffic," Welch said.

But Tom Petersen with Citizens for Responsible Mining says Kennecott's proposed mine and others won't cause environmental problems.

"They won't be the same scale as the iron ore mines,” Petersen said.  “They'll have much less impact than the iron ore mines have."

U.P. tourism officials agree, if there are no catastrophic environmental accidents, then the perception of the U.P. as a tourist-friendly wilderness will continue.

"If the mine opens, or mines plural, and it doesn't add much in the news or perception of problems, I don't think there's any issue," said Tom Nemacheck, Executive Director of the U.P. Travel and Recreation Association.

But Nemacheck warns that it would take only one major environmental problem to do serious damage.

"An environmental story, of any kind, when you're selling yourself as a 5 star wilderness, is an issue," Nemacheck said.

Mine proponents point to the Cleveland-Cliffs' summer mine tours and Kennecott's Flambeau Mine as an example of mining adding to the tourism industry.

"Tourists love mines,” Tom Petersen, President of Citizens for Responsible Mining said.  “If you go around, the Flambeau Mine in Wisconsin was the second most popular tourist site when it was operating."

But if we look at the past, according to N.M.U. professor Russ Magnaghi, that's not always the case.

"I don't think you had a lot of tourists coming up to Calumet, Michigan and the Keweenaw Peninsula to see the beauty of the area standing in the middle of Calumet and Hecla's mining operation."

Read the first segment of this series
Read the second segment of this series 
Read the third segment of this series
Watch more Digging In  

Links of interest:
Kennecott Eagle Project
Aquila Resources
Prime Meridian
Bitterroot Resources
Save the Wild U.P.

SPONSORED CONTENT
4 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV6, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

Let's get responsible here.

Posted by Jim OUTDOORS, Chicago - Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 9:44 p.m.

Who is Peterson kidding. I don't come to the UP for the mines. I don't love the mines. Please don't generalize all tourist as mine loving dumbos.

Kennecott

Posted by R LAIT, UP - Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 11:39 p.m.

Has anyone figured out that Kennecott now is owned by China.

own everything

Posted by D L, Marquette - Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 10:29 p.m.

What really disturbs me is the fact that these companies have been buying acres of land like their is no tomorrow without the public being able to have an opportunity to claim a stake in any of it--this is public land we are talking about, and if the state can sell the mineral rights to a private company, they should be able to sell it to individuals as well. What I find really disturbing is that someone might own some land, but someone might claim water rights, a third will claim timber rights, and a fourth could claim mineral rights--soon we'll be charged for air. the public does lose out the most in these mining deals. In the early copper and iron boom in the UP, individuals were able to create their own companies from scratch--that's not going to be the case anymore, and it's truly a sad thing to witness. If we want to be honest with ourselves about an economic boost, the only way to insure that is to have the mines locally owned if possible.

Seriously

Posted by Outdoor Adventure, Negaunee - Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 4:42 p.m.

I am very fortunate to live in this great, great land that we call home. I love the outdoors, and spend a lot of time fishing, hunting, hiking, taking photo's, skiing..you get the idea. But I find it very hard to believe the following comment "It changes the region from primarily an outdoor wonderful green attraction, to fenced areas, industrial areas, large traffic," Welch said.

We have thousands and thousands of land and beauty here in the U.P. Having a few mines here in the U.P. will not hamper our tourism to the point that Michelle Halley feels or states... "I certainly believe people would choose not to come if the U.P. has a reputation as a new sulfide mining district," Michelle Halley with the National Wildlife Federation said.

If anything it will ensure that people will want to stay here and have economic reasons to stay and raise their children. These children will still benefit from the same things that we do today. I don't think the U.P. will ever be recognized as a slifide mining district. Lets be proud of what he have to offer and the economic impact that this could have from our neighbors who own the local grocery store to our other neighbor who needs a job to provide a roof over their head. I say if tese mining companies do as they are suppose to and get all the permits required that I support any and all that wish to provide strong economic changes needed here in the Upper Peninsula. There can be a balance between mining, the outdoors, and tourism!!

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO