Digging In: Part Three Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Check This Out!

checkthisoutnewhome

yoopertubehome 

Photo

What are the economic implications of more mines in Upper Michigan?

By Jerry Hume
Wednesday, February 20, 2008 at 4:27 p.m.

Read more: Local

MENOMINEE COUNTY -- Aquila Resources in Menominee County is still exploring their sulfide ore body, but they already employ 12 people.  In Marquette County, Jon Cherry with Kennecott Minerals says they plan on employing 120 workers for their Eagle Project mine.

"New mines that get developed in the U.P. would inject a lot of new cash into the local economy, which I think would be a great thing,” Cherry said.  “New jobs would be created, new taxes would be created; all these things are missing from the economy right now."

Depending on the price of commodities, Kennecott estimates between $70 million and $300 million in tax revenues and royalties will go to the state, county, and local communities during the mine’s life.  On top of that, construction of the mine would require another 200 workers to build the mine.

"Right now it's some of the slowest construction times we've had in the last several years,” said Tony Retaskie, the Executive Director of the U.P. Construction Council.  “Many of our members are working out of the state of Michigan right now, so this mine would mean an opportunity and would mean some of our workers could come home and work right here in the U.P."

The problem, environmentalists say, is what happens to the U.P. after the mine, or mines, close.

"It's a pattern that we can look at--towns all over the U.P., they thrive for a few years and then they collapse," said Babette Welch with Save the Wild U.P.

Dick Huey with Save the Wild U.P. says these new mines aren't your parents' kind of mining.  He says it’s short-term and won't provide the economic benefit like Cleveland-Cliffs iron ore operations.

"It's a boom and bust kind of economy,” Huey said, “and boy, when that kind of economy goes bust, it goes bust for a long time."

Kennecott is using its community advisory group and the Lake Superior Community Partnership (LSCP) to determine what might be done after their mine closes.

"It's a little different when we had the boom and bust in the iron ore industry that wasn't planned,” said LSCP CEO Amy Clickner.  “We know from day one what their plans are and how we as a community need to react."

Still, Russ Magnaghi, a U.P. history professor at N.M.U., says mining is a short-term solution to the U.P.'s economic problems.  He and environmental organizations say we should be investing in more sustainable industries.

"We should be using the environment to attract people, to develop tourism," Magnaghi said.  "Today we're at a crossroads.  You have tourism on one side, you have mining on the other side."

Read the first segment of this series
Read the second segment of this series 

Watch more Digging In  

Links of interest:
Kennecott Eagle Project
Aquila Resources
Prime Meridian
Bitterroot Resources
Save the Wild U.P.

SPONSORED CONTENT
5 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV6, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

RE: Tom

Posted by Alex S., Marquette - Monday, May 05, 2008 at 12:04 p.m.

By the looks of your spelling and grammar, you wouldn't get a job at Kennecott anyway. I applaud you for feeling that passionate, but there are less than 100 jobs. What do you think your chances of being employed there? Tens of thousands of people are for this mine because they think they will be helped out by them. Get real!

The Upper michigan needs some sort of shot in the arm economicaly

Posted by Tom Gould, escanaba - Monday, May 05, 2008 at 7:46 a.m.

I will be personally attacked once again but I will say it. When will the law makers in the U.P. get with it. The economic situation is terrible. We have a huge percentage of people living off of Department of Human services. The money from that comes out of our pockets through taxes. We have a record number of people leaving Michigan. I believe 6 percent of the population has left, and G.M. will be laying off even more people downstate, because trucks are not selling due to oil prices.

The job market in escanaba is terrible, and it is terrible as well in Marquette. We have most of our youth going to school and then leaving to find work. I have been looking for work since november and there isn't any.

A mine by definition is not substanable. A lot of those tree hugging radicals hate the idea of a mine. They spout of rhetoric such as. The people of the U.P. will be drinking acid in their water. Its going to damage the area. Let me tell you something about mines in the U.S. They are required by Federal law to restore the land to what it was after that mine is gone. That is something the tree hugging knuts don't tell you. I have seen kenekot mines. They opened one in Salt Lake City . The tree hugging radicals will be first in line to use the product the mine producs in the form of cd players, and computers, cell phones. Copper is a great conductor of electricity, and it is used in a lot of computer components and electronic components.

70 million to 300 million dollars is better then then zero million dollars, and we can help the U.P. grow and develop into something more then what it is. I think a lot of Upper Michigan families would like to have jobs, and employment, and a sense of finacial security. Even if it is 2-3 years. That is 2-3 years hundreds of people will be making good money to support their family.

I really don't understand why the people in the U.P. fight development so much. Again the economic situation here is terrible. I think we can all agree on that. How many of you people reading this can honestly not claim this. These tree hugging knuts will also say we should invest in tourism or something else. Tourism will still mean development. It will still mean cutting into natural habitat to produce the facilities. Our youth are leaving. We have had a lot of people want to come up and develop something to give the economy a shot in the arm, and they are pushed out and the people don't want it. The people then complain there is no work here. There are no jobs here.

I once heard someone say I think its funny how you people in Escanaba think they know whats best for people in marquette. MY answer to that man is this. These are jobs I could be working at, and instead on living on welfare(due to lack of work here), I could be going to marquette, and I could be working and putting food on my kids table with a job that pays more the minimum wage. Instead of leaching money from Michigan's pockets in form of food stamps, I would producing money and helping with the tax to generate money for the City and state. How many of you folks here are tired of your propert taxes going up, and other forms of taxes and fees the cities have around here. They do that because they are broke themselves. The cities aren't exactly generating money or have any sort of tax base. They turn to their people in the form of taxes.

I will summ up what I am saying.

#1 A mine by defintion is not self sustaining. However, when the mining companies leave they are required by federal law to restore the land to what it was when they leave.

#2 70 million to 300 million dollars is better then zero dollars, and for 5-10 years we could have hundreds of jobs that will bring a lot of money to the families up here and money into the local economy that would boost everything. From property value, to the value of your land.

#3 We will not be drinking battery acid in our water. This is not going to destroy our water table. They have very strict Federal guidelines as to how they are to operate.

private person

Posted by john armbruster, st charles michigan - Sunday, April 13, 2008 at 11:10 a.m.

My question is from what i have heard that kennecott will pave the roads that lead to the mine and also put electricity in to there mine..is that true..and what is going to happen to people like myself who have cabins and property near the mine. exspecialy my drinking water ...two miles from the mine.

what if

Posted by wonderin' s, ishpeming - Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 7:39 p.m.

first off i would like to throw this out there....was there ever this much retaliation against cci before they opened? has anyone ever listened to stories from miners at cci and heard of they're mistakes, polluting,etc.? i attended the public hearings that were held this fall and heard 2 different environmentalists publicly threaten that when this mine is opened that equipment would end up damaged, and sprayed with graffati....this coming from people who cry to save the enviornment, world and stop pollution. GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!let's think about that...spray paint comes in what??that's right, an aerosol can..duh?! stop crying about our kids and peers leaving the state for work. let us construction workers stay close to home and enjoy time here. tourists won't stop coming here because of a mine. how many people tour cci every summer? if it weren't for mines being a part of our past, 90% of us most likely wouldn't be here in this area...sleep on that.

Revenues , Taxes

Posted by Rusty Bridges, Forsythe - Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 10:19 a.m.

They are saying that the state and county might get between 70 and 300 million from this mine when they will be taking billions out of the ground here . The state and county need to renegotiate for a larger piece of the royalties . 70 to 300 million is just CHUMP CHANGE to these companies . The land they use will be poisoned forever and then there will be the accidents poisoning even more water and land . These mines will change the UP forever

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO