DEQ approves mine permits Watch Video Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Check This Out!

checkthisoutnewhome

yoopertubehome 

Photo

But Kennecott Minerals still needs DNR approval.

By Heather Sawaski
Friday, December 14, 2007 at 7:42 p.m.

Read more: Local, State, Business

MARQUETTE -- Kennecott Minerals submitted permit applications for the construction of a nickel-copper mine on the Yellow Dog Plains in February of 2006. And after the most thorough review ever conducted by the DEQ, all three permits were approved.

"Their proposal met all the strict standards of Michigan's laws and when that's the case," says DEQ Press Secretary, Robert McCann, "the DEQ is required to enter a company permit. We did as thorough a review as we could, but the bottom line was that we needed to issue the permits."

But some alterations were made to the documents. The DEQ says there needs to be an air filtration system on the mine's ventilation stack. This is to ensure that all air pollution in the mine is captured and properly filtered before it's released.

Also, the agency put a limit on the height of the mine's roof pillar under the Salmon-Trout Creek.

"What we were able to do is build a limit that they can only mine up to a certain elevation, which is 327 meters," says McCann. "If they want to go above that, they need to come back to the DEQ to get written approval for further analysis."

But opponents of the mine aren't satisfied with the adjustments. The National Wildlife Federation plans on filing suit to stop construction.

"Even with those adjustments that were outlined in the DEQ's press release," says NWF Attorney, Michelle Halley,  "there are still significant gaps and problems with the application that the DEQ hasn't come close to addressing."

As for Kennecott Minerals, officials say they're pleased with the permit grants and are eager to begin the next phase of the project.

"The next steps from here...we have to provide the DEQ with a 30-day construction notification, which we'll be doing very shortly," says Project Manager, Jon Cherry. "We have to post a bond for 417 million, which we'll also do. We have to wait for the DNR to issue final authorizations, which are scheduled for mid-January. And we should be able to break ground and begin construction shortly after."

Kennecott is still waiting for two Surface Rights Permits to be granted from the DNR. That decision is expected on January 10, but Kennecott is still able to go ahead with mining plans even before the release of those permits.

 

SPONSORED CONTENT
12 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, TV6, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

the antis

Posted by eino maki, mqt - Monday, December 17, 2007 at 10:15 a.m.

Vocal Majority,(in your own mind)

Your assumptions are ignorant.

"antis using lies- using words like war crimes"

How can you throw libelous accusations of lies here, sir, It's litigation in the US District Courts. You should know, you know so much about RIO TINTO- parent company of Kennecott.

Maybe do a bit of research on Rio Tinto and human rights violations on three continents-might be a good place to start.


Then, look at the Marquette Yellow Pages. All kinds of jobs there, a testament to the many types of employment in the UP. btw, don't see any $5 hr jobs for selling pebbles.

Mining is but one category of employment. And yes, CCI roots go way back in the UP and continue to be important as long as the market dicatates. But CCI is not RIO TINTO. Differences in many ways, but Kennecott doesn't want this distinction as it would blow their local support out of the water.

Right now, sulfide mining is ZERO. NADA. Non existent, because it has never been proven to not pollute. Not even Flambeau could get a complete certification of completion.

If you can't understand how tourism brings lots of dollars to the UP,, you are blind at best.

It might be wise to watch the news this winter and listen a little closer to the stories on tourism dollars related to snowfall, or better yet, tell the chamber of commerce and all of the associated businesses that tourism dollars are a joke.

vocal minority? whatever.

if its so good for the economy...

Posted by Erica H. , Marquette - Sunday, December 16, 2007 at 1:32 p.m.

If this is so good for the economy, then what are we going to do when they stop the mine? Kcott themselves gave the project no more than 15 years! So what will happen to those 100 or so locals who get good jobs, buy a house and a sled, have some kids, and then their source of income packs up and leaves with all the profits? Profit needs to be long term, sustainable, and LOCAL.

And by the way, the environmental concerns are not "imaginary." They are quite well documented among reliable sources if you actually take the time to do some research.

90%!!!!!!!!!

Posted by Professional Engineer, Marquette - Sunday, December 16, 2007 at 1:30 p.m.

Can you believe it! 90% of us are opposed to the mine! If this "fact" doesn't make you giggle just a little bit, ponder some of the other twisted facts that have been presented in this situation. 90% of those speaking at a public hearing does not make 90% of the entire populace! Wake up people, statistics can say whatever you want them to say. The DEQ says Kennecott has met the requirements of the law, let the courts decide or not. We know that's coming.

times will change

Posted by Vocal majority, Harvey - Sunday, December 16, 2007 at 12:02 p.m.

I find it interesting how fast the antis can change their position on things. When it was about a snowmobile trail, tourists jobs were worthless. Now all of a sudden selling pebbles for 5 bucks an hour is a quality job?

I also find it interesting how the antis seem to be the ones telling lies, and using words like war crimes. Just because they are most vocal, eveyone feels as they do? Most every poll I have seen shows the majority supports the mine. Yet the antis say the gov does not listen to the majority? A guy comes into the meeting about the trail in Harvey. Says you can go to any snowmobile shop and buy a snowmobile that goes 150 mph. And the antis clap? Shows how uneducated the antis are.

The antis went out and got a special spokesman for the TV debate from down state. And the man made a fool out of the people against the mine.

The people who are against every business have blown it for them selfs. All the lies and mud slinging has hurt their creditability.

The majority may be quiet. But as we lose more jobs and rights, the majority will wake up and shut down the so vocal minority.

dont prostatute the u.p.

Posted by Bud Caryl, Grand Marais - Sunday, December 16, 2007 at 11:51 a.m.

IS this mine worth tearing up a nice place to make a few bucks?I I think not wisconsen didnt want it so why do we? I urge everyone to write the D.N.R. and tell theam we dont want this in our part of the state.

elitists

Posted by joseph vento, marquette - Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 9:19 p.m.

it's not just the elitists against this mine, it's probably 90% of Marquette County, then all of the tourists that come to the UP for the recreational lands and clean air and water.

Kennecott is dirty. Plain and simple. They are one of Utah's LARGEST polluters, releasing tons of toxic pollution annually. Their parent company Rio Tinto, has lawsuits against them for numerous international human rights violations, even war crimes,,, google poboya, kelian, bougainville to name a few....good reading.

Do you want this company in your backyard??

If not, write the DNR. Their decision comes Jan 10th,
better to try and make your voice heard than to assume the DNR has already been paid off and made their decision.

We have the elitists on our side anyway. Legal recourse and resources just might stop this mine, one way or the other, if indeed the people are not heard and their voices not honored by the DNR. The DEQ obviously ignored the majority. So much for community outcry affecting the DEQ's decision.

Great Job!!

Posted by john mining, marquette - Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 8:18 p.m.

I am glad to see we finally have progress with such a great project that will help our economy. Great work on following the laws and doing it right.

It's been a long road

Posted by Ron Whiton, Calumet - Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 7:51 p.m.

It's a great day in the UP, but, it isn't over yet. Hopefully the court will see into the dishonest and anecdotal nature of the opposition's positions. The DEQ did a great job of defining the regulations for this mining. There cannot be another mine in the world that has taken such great steps to satisfy the environmental concerns, both real and imaginary.

lifetime Yooper

Posted by Chuck Winters, Iron Mountain - Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 6:07 p.m.

Finally a good decision from a Government agency. This is a good thing for the UP and, as shown by the Hearings this Fall, it's what the majority of the residents of the UP want. Good luck to Kennecott Minerals on the rest of the permit process and the implementation of the facility.

Yeah...

Posted by Mike p, i - Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 6:04 p.m.

I wouldn't be able to live here if I didn't have a Mining Job. Now others will have the same chance I was Given to provide a good life for their family

do not tear up the u.p.

Posted by Bud Caryl, Grand Marais - Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 8:43 a.m.

Why do they want build a mine? this should be stoped.One of the reason people live in the u.p. is for its beuity and solitude.

Mine permit issues

Posted by Joe Miner, U.P. - Friday, December 14, 2007 at 11:07 p.m.

Finally, logic prevails in this debate. Bring your business to Michigan...at least someone is! And they followed the letter of the law to a "t"

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO